Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. They were showing us the pictures of the waves converging to a point a meditation trick and this picture had a caption explaining that the unified field theory has already been found. The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful. And quantum mechanics is often used as the explanation for that. DO WE KNOW? : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Whether you're religious, spiritual, or none of the above, you can say one thing for this movie: it's an equal-opportunity offender. There were many more, but I will leave them for others. Unfortunately hes written no papers after 1995, see, http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=find+a+hagelin&FORMAT=WWW&SEQUENCE=. But most of the talking heads' quotes seem either to have a hidden agenda, or to be sliced and diced to buttress Ramtha's ideas. Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. Supported by groups like the Templeton Foundation, legitimateor more creative scientists are exploring the mind-body connection, or the similarities between particle-and-wave physics and certain religious concepts like the Trinity. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. 7. Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. subscription yet. Krauss worries that a lot of people can be fooled by appeals to the admittedly weird world of quantum physics a world in which particles are said to take every possible path from point A to point B, in which the position and velocity of particles are necessarily cloaked in uncertainty, in which the mere act of observation changes the thing being observed. "Contrary to ordinary beliefs, quantum physics is very predictive," Dr. de Gouva continues. Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. . While the movie "What The Bleep" has some flaws from a science point of view, science of this type is so foreign to most people, that they feel they have to "jazz it up" to keep people interested. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". Science and engineering are important for our future, and anything that engages the public can only be a good thing." ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. Where were we now? But quantum mechanics rules out the possibility of hidden variables. Prominent if you go by citations that is. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? D (k)ow!? What the Bleep Do We Know? The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. Nobody does.". Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. "The theory can't predict with precision what will happen, but it knows everything that can happen and it will tell you the probability of all these things happening.". "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. But quantum-mechanical computers might be able to, and then of course we'd have to start thinking about how to make things more secure. [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. !" is a radical departure from convention. The Christian Science Monitor has expired. After a lesson in quantum mechanics from a precocious kid on a . Q: You do see that in some science-fiction shows for example, last season on "Fringe." Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. What the Bleep Do We Know!? When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). So does classical physics. Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. We're such a shallow people. A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. Skeptic James Randi described the film as "a fantasy docudrama" and "[a] rampant example of abuse by charlatans and cults". "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. 2. I guess it's a sign that quantum physics is entering the mainstream A: Well, yeah, the point is that there have been these new-age desires for lots of things to make the world better: crystals, energy vortices. Hagelin was a grad student at Harvard when I was an undergrad and I met him when we were in the same quantum field theory class. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." "I begin the book with a quote from Feynman that says, 'Reality takes precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,'" he told me. The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. Joe Dispenza A: Absolutely. The figures are a bit rubbery, but the idea that we're only 'aware' of a fraction of our brain's activity is both correct and a huge relief. Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. (Source: iStockphoto). We're also connected to the universe by gravity, and we're connected to the planets by gravity. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. The main thing to know is that "observation" is a bad word for the process which goes on which we have inherited from the days when quantum mechanics was first discovered, and is unfortunately a bit easier to teach in introductory courses than decoherence. Even followers of spiritual traditions that believe in worldly illusion will have problems with "Bleep." But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . Tags: science-and-technology, neuroscience, physics. The question "What the bleep do we know?" has an unambiguous answer: both surprisingly much and amazingly little. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. 2004 ( ) ( ) Offline 2013. John Haglin It was one of the most important moments in history. We are connected to the world by many things: by light and sound and heat. I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. is released on Friday. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. I want to mention another point Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. You are free to comment as you wish. That movie started its life as a small documentary about Spirit and Science, but grew in scope (and budget) and became What the BLEEP Do We Know!? I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. According to his books, water exposed to loving words shows brilliant and attractive patterns, while water exposed to negative thoughts forms incomplete patterns. Cast. Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. to someone you know: And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. And it certainly doesn't depend on an observer to make this happen. The only problem with Andrew Newberg's statement is that it suggests our subconscious brains are doing really interesting stuff and we're somehow missing out; if only we could harness that other zillion gigabits or so we'd be masters of our destinies. A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. The quantum world does pervade everything around us, but as Richard Feynman liked to say, "Scientific creativity is imagination in a straitjacket." We're always being told we don't use our brain to its full capacity. Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. Photos View All Photos Movie Info Amanda, a divorced photographer, has a fantastic experience when life begins to unravel around her, revealing the cellular,. She's averse to churches (she married her husband in one, so they must be bad! With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie, Robert Bailey Jr.. A fictional photographer's quest to spiritually rediscover herself is interspersed with documentary footage of scientists and theologians discussing the philosophical aspects of quantum physics. There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. In the documentary segments of the film, interviewees discuss the roots and meaning of Amanda's experiences. Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf for only $16.05 $11/page. The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. does a reasonable job of presenting some of these quandaries, researchers say. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. It is just a movie. And I came out of wanting to meditate more often, which can't be a bad thing. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. Everything from the possibility of disappearing and reappearing, to the possibility of having strange new forms of communication. It's used as an excuse to be even weirder. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" You'll even applaud the wedding Polka scene there's just not enough Eastern European folk culture in contemporary film. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. The film was also discussed in a letter published in Physics Today that challenges how physics is taught, saying teaching fails to "expose the mysteries physics has encountered [and] reveal the limits of our understanding". But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. You should be wary whenever you hear something like, "Quantum mechanics connects you with the universe" or "quantum mechanics unifies you with everything else." Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". He has stated in several venues that his views were totally misrepresented in the film. If you want to affect something in the external world, you have to do something to it. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. He claims that in over 5 hours of interviews he explained to the film makers why their concept of how Quantum Physics works has virtually no support in the scientific community. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Science Fiction, Comedy, Drama, Documentary, Fantasy, Special Interest Filmed in Portland, Oregon, What the Bleep Do We Know!? His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. Real news, real hope. During the Fall of the year Amanda begins to see the world in new and different ways when she begins to question her role in life, her relationships with her career and men and what it all means. Down The Rabbit Hole\". VISiT http://docsubtitles.blogspot.comsubscribe to watch full moviecheck also short trailer http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJOrsql3KwU Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. I started out thinking that BLEEP 2 would be a ground-breaking update covering ideas and discoveries in quantum physics, brain neurology and consciousness studies introduced over a decade ago. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. Moreover, the movie proposes no plausible physical mechanism by which thoughts influence matter. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. If it were manifest, you could run at a wall a lot of times, and every now and then you'd spontaneously appear on the other side of the wall. Q: You do see that in some science . Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. One should take seriously the danger that hes not the only one deluding himself. Matt, what is so nutty about Serge Langs ideas about HIV and AIDS? Some lost their entire life savings. Sol. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. You can't just hope for the best. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. . Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. What the Bleep Do We Know!? Magician and skeptic James Randi, famous for debunking performers like Uri Geller, has offered his standard prize of $1 million cash money to Dr Emoto if he can get the same results when doing the water study this way. 1. As the movie did, this book compels listeners to ask themselves Gre. Happy Water Crystals Debunked as PseudoScience June 23rd, 2018 - Are Dr Masaru Emoto?s Fantastic Claims Actually Real Via is masaru emoto . The meditation may not have helped the victims of violent crime, but it did win Hagelin the 1994 Ig Nobel Peace Prize. It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. From my perspective, once you had identtified Smolins position( I gave this in previous post[Posted by sol at September 25, 2004 04:18 PM] ), then you would know he holds Einsteins, in relation to the Solvay meetings, and strings have modified what Bohr and Schrodinger were doing in developing QM. Everyone knows quantum mechanics is weird, so why not use that to justify it? The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:I'm citing \"Fair Use\" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdfAlso \"Fair Dealing\" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4ahttp://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4Censorship is NOT a valid argument.This is the first part of my critical analysis of \"What The Bleep Do We Know?! Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. Particles embracing all possible states until they are forced by an experiment to assume one state, one particle being in two adjacent places simultaneously, the inability to precisely measure a particle's position and momentum at the same time - these are just a few of the weird manifestations of quantum physics. bleep blorp!" I implore all of you to ignore Rubio's critics and acknowledge that the senator from Florida is absolutely correct. The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? But is reality really in the eye of the quantum observer? Ive not seen the movie, and dont intend to, but David Alberts book on Quantum Mechanics and Experience is one of the best things Ive read on the interpretation of QM. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. Film / What the #$*! The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. - Dr. Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. That's one of the very strange properties of quantum mechanics. We do, at subatomic scale, behave quantum mechanically. Her experiences are offered by the filmmakers to illustrate the film's scientifically-unsupported thesis about quantum physics and consciousness. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. subscription. ?, with over 15 hours of material on three double-sided DVDs. Hagelin might be crazy, but some of those papers are co-written by John Ellis and other respectable people. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Several books have been written about the film's remarkable grassroots marketing campaign, which led to its unprecedented success. "[5] The same article quotes Bill Pfau, Advertising Manager of Inner Traditions, as saying "More and more ideas from the New Age community have become accepted into the mainstream. And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. If you have questions about your account, please There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way.

Shaquille O'neal Amphion Chair Instructions, Digital Cloud Solution Architect Microsoft Salary, Tim Sweeney House Cary, Length Of White Lines On Road Uk, What Happened To Rmd Garage, Articles W